Wind’s PTC: The Opposition Mounts (117 groups and counting)
0 comments Posted by Unknown at 12:27 PMWind’s PTC: The Opposition Mounts (117 groups and counting)
by Robert Bradley Jr.
June 11, 2014
June 11, 2014
“The U.S. wind industry has … demonstrated reliability and performance levels that make them very competitive.”
- Statement of Michael L.S. Bergey, American Wind Energy Association, 1986.
“The wind PTC was initially passed in 1992 as a temporary incentive to help a then fledgling industry – with the expectation that wind energy would be environmentally benign and would become commercially viable. However, after nearly 40 years of subsidies for wind energy R&D and 20 years of lucrative wind energy tax breaks — together totaling over $100 billion.”- Glenn Schleede, “Republicans for Obama Energy (Senate Finance Committee Okays PTC/ITC Subsidies),” April 16, 2014.
Concentrated benefits/diffused costs.
The cronies, rent-seeking profits calculated, lobby government in the
capitals. Most of the rest of us, just paying a fraction of a penny for
their many dollars, stay home. That’s how government grows and bad
public-policy rationales get going.
Wind power and other qualifying
renewables got their government largesse long ago. Even before
the Energy Policy Act of 1992, the American Wind Energy Association
(AWEA) was promising coming competitiveness with just a bit more
subsidy, a little more time. Then the taxpayer favor could go away, they
promised time and again.
The open-ended, outsized tax subsidy
for qualifying renewable energy, a mainstay of Obama energy policy, is a
Republican, not only Democrat, problem. Texas, for example, thanks to Enron
in a bootlegger-and-Baptist coalition with pro-wind environmentalists,
is a Republican friendly state for AWEA et al. Note the support for wind
from, for example, Sen. John Cornyn.
New Coalition Letter
Earlier this week, a coalition letter (reprinted below) urged Congress not to renew the wind PTC in these words:
“On behalf of our groups
and organizations, together representing millions of Americans, we write
to express our strong opposition to renewing expired wind tax
incentives.
“Over the past 20 years, American
taxpayers have seen little return from the forced investment in wind
energy. This handout consistently fails to deliver on its promise of
long-term job creation, economic activity, and affordability. It
promotes government favoritism in the energy marketplace, threatens the
reliability of the electric grid, and a 1 year extension costs $12
billion over 10 years. Recent reports and studies have also shown that
subsidizing wind energy results in higher electricity costs for American
families.
“American taxpayers deserve a portfolio
of energy solutions that are economically viable, not those that have
to be propped up by carve outs in the tax code.”
See more at:
The myth of the climate change 97%
By Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer
Secretary
of State John Kerry, President Obama
and others frequently claim that climate change
will have “crippling consequences,” and that
“Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree that
climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.”
In reality, the assertion is science fiction. The
so-called consensus comes from a handful of
surveys and exercises in counting abstracts from
scientific papers – all of which have been contra-
dicted by more reliable research.
and others frequently claim that climate change
will have “crippling consequences,” and that
“Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree that
climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.”
In reality, the assertion is science fiction. The
so-called consensus comes from a handful of
surveys and exercises in counting abstracts from
scientific papers – all of which have been contra-
dicted by more reliable research.
There is no basis for the claim that "97% of scientists" believe that man-made
climate change is a dangerous problem.
climate change is a dangerous problem.
To read the entire WSJ article, go to:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)