Officials need to answer questions regarding 'Green Wyoming' claims
0 comments Posted by Unknown at 5:01 PMOfficials need to answer questions regarding 'Green Wyoming' claims
After
reading the Batavia Daily News report,
Working to build a 'Green Wyoming', we have some questions we hope Wyoming County Economic Development Director, Jim Daly, can answer for
all of us.
Mr. Daly said, “We’ve
been discussing starting a ‘Green Wyoming’… The goal is cheaper electric rates
for county residents and businesses… The savings would be generated by
renewable energy."
We are sure Mr. Daly will understand
our difficulty buying in on these claims, considering the fact that Wyoming
County has been developing ‘renewables’ off the backs of taxpayers and
ratepayers for more than a decade now. Meanwhile, our electric rates have continued
to climb and New York State has maintained some of the highest rates in the nation.
We are hoping Mr. Daly and our
Wyoming County leaders could share with all of us the research and the
cost-benefit analysis -- derived from the experience of others long-invested in
the pursuit of 'renewables' worldwide -- that they have done to verify their
specious claims? (See: Renewables
In Europe Average 16 Times More Expensive Than Gas-Fired Power: http://tinyurl.com/qbavw7y )
We are also wondering if Mr. Daly understands
the complete contradiction contained with his claim that someone can “…generate 100 percent of all
their electric," while he flippantly admitted they still have to “…use the regular power grid…"
when their favored, unreliable ‘renewable’ source is missing in action?
Do Mr.
Daly and Wyoming County officials understand that it is all the rest of us who get
to foot the bill for this redundant, Politically-correct
power? (see: http://tinyurl.com/kybm93k )?
We
are
wondering if Wyoming County officials understand that solar energy is
probably
the absolute worst energy source to propose for cloudy New York State –
unavailable at night and on cloudy days (which is well over half of the
year here in WNY), and with an awful Capacity Factor of around 10%? (See: Dear Northeast, How’s that solar working out
for ya? http://tinyurl.com/oey3q99 )
Do County
officials have any idea how much has already been spent on unreliable
‘renewables’ to date, which is contributing to our $18 TRILLION dollar debt? (See: $TRILLIONS Spent: Zero CO2 Abated: http://tinyurl.com/pppt3tz )
To be
clear, no one objects to 'green' energy per se, as long as those pursuing it
are using their OWN money to do so.
Yet, what New York State officials continue to perpetuate is a system of
robbing Peter to pay Paul. The
rich can afford to buy in on these ‘green’ energy sources du jour, while those
who cannot afford to, get to shoulder the costs.
Taxpayer and ratepayer-funded ‘grants,’ incentives and/or subsidies being
handed down from the Obama and Cuomo administrations are what is driving the
pursuit of these 'green' schemes. They act only to transfer the wealth from the
general population into the pockets of 'renewable' developers who know how to work the system, and
the few who can afford their hefty share of 'going green.' The end result
will be to continue to "skyrocket electricity rates" --
just as President Obama forewarned his green energy policy would do -- which ultimately
hurts the poor the most.
Let’s hope New York State officials wake
up before they follow the Pied Piper over the 'green' cliff, and thrust ever more
people into "energy poverty" - defined in Europe as being when a
person's power bills are over 10% of their income. Too many people are already there.
Tireless
advocate for scientifically-sound, reliable, affordable electricity for ALL
Americans,
Mary Kay
Barton
It has often been said that the “devil is in the
details.” Legal language in the “confidentiality contracts” found in the
agreements between Industrial Wind LLCs (Limited Liability Corporations) and
landowners is the best example of this age-old axiom.
Landowner leases and “good neighbor agreements” entered
into with these multi-million-dollar, multi-national corporations NEED a trusted
lawyer’s oversight. Besides the fact that wind industry salesmen have never
provided any PROOF to back up all of their false and misleading claims, the hot
air contained in the legal mumbo-jumbo within their lease agreements is actually
nothing less than the signing away of your First Amendment rights. These legal
documents are tied to your property forever, even after the property changes
hands. Landowners in Wyoming County ended up with
liens on their property when one of the wind developers failed to pay
contractors.
Verbiage that should send up the red flag on wind leases
for massive industrial-scale turbines on your real estate includes the fact that
the landowner allows the wind corporation to “go over, under through and across”
leased land — oftentimes for a period of 40 years, with the Big Wind LLC having
the right of renewal on those leases. Many believe this also jeopardizes mineral
rights of the property under contract.
Another hard-to-decipher clause, usually toward the end
of the wind lease contract, states that the Big Wind LLC, at their discretion,
can alter any condition of the contract. WOW! Really?!? You might as well just
hand the deed over now! Over 40 issues involved with these lease agreements can
be further researched here: http://www.wiseenergy.org/Energy/Leaseholder.pdf
“Good neighbor agreements” are confidentiality contracts
the Big Wind LLC seeks to have “non-participating neighbors” sign, in which you
basically forfeit your rights to address the very grievances that Big Wind
swears do not exist — problems that ARE occurring
nationwide, and around the world.
The negative impacts include, but are not limited to:
Noise/infra-sound, shadow flicker, health impacts, resonant ground vibrations,
interruption of TV and cell phone frequencies, interference with ham radio and
radar signals, destroyed rural heritage and scenic vistas, negatively-impacted
property values (see Michael McCann report, www.GreatLakeswindtruth.org), etc. ...
In fact, residents in Wyoming County are now suing Invenergy due to the resulting
problems they are stuck dealing with. In Wisconsin, the Board of
Health just dubbed Duke Energy’s Shirley Wind Project a “human health hazard,”
because so many people are complaining and even abandoning their homes as a
result of resulting problems created by the wind factory. There are currently at
least 12 lawsuits going on in as many states due to the ill-effects being
created by these giant, sprawling wind factories.
Furthermore, if you sign a lease contract with a Big
Wind LLC, a clause states that you will promote the company’s product and not
say anything derogatory about it, while also agreeing to hold the wind company
harmless. This is equivalent to giving up your rights for free speech — a
self-imposed “gag-order”! This is why people who have signed wind-leases can not
complain about the negative impacts of wind turbines.
For instance, in Wyoming County — during the 2013 wind factory construction
phase, an Orangeville cash-cropper signed leases for wind turbines on properties
he owned on the other side of Orangeville which were away from his home farm,
that had been in the family for generations. He then decided to lease some of
his strawberry fields across the street and down the road from his house on
Orangeville Center
Road. He did not want any wind turbines on his home-farm,
where he lived with his wife and three kids. Because the wind company reserves
the right to alter the conditions of the contract at their discretion, and since
a neighboring landowner who decided not to sign a “good neighbor agreement”
which would have allowed the siting of a turbine near their property, the wind
company simply moved the turbine to the farmers home-farm — despite his
objections. As a result, the access road then had to be switched to the his
home-farm side yard, approximately 75 feet away from his house, continuing west
and then running between his barn and maple syrup shanty, and right through his
kid’s riding arena.
The now-disgruntled wind-leaseholder then consulted his
attorney to terminate the lease. He was informed that this fight would cost
millions of dollars, and would be close to impossible to win since he had signed
their lease agreements. This farmer and his family now have a beautiful view of
about a dozen, 430-foot-tall wind turbines, with their 164-foot-long, 11-TON
blades whirring overhead at 200 mph at the blade tips, complete with flashing
red strobe lights that drive many crazy — including one directly to their west,
obscuring a once-beautiful view. (Mind you, turbines being proposed by Apex are
to be 570 feet tall — a full 140 feet taller than the monsters littering
Wyoming County!)
Of utmost importance, Michael McCann, a certified real
estate appraiser from Chicago, licensed in 25 states, and with 30 years
experience in dealing with properties located amongst wind projects has detailed
a Property Protection Plan that simply makes sense. I would think that wind
developer, Apex “Clean” Energy LLC, would be happy to sign and guarantee
property values of landowners if they are sure about their claims that resulting
problems caused by wind factories supposedly do not exist. Apex has stated on
display boards at their “wind-fo-mercials” in Barker and Yates, that these
570-foot-tall industrial wind turbines placed in and around homes and farms in
Niagara and Orleans counties, WILL NOT
affect your property values. Thus, Apex should more than happy to sign a
Property Protection Plan, drawn up by an independent lawyer of the land-owners’
choosing, in order to protect all involved.
“Caveat emptor” — Let the BUYER BEWARE! Think again
before you sign your freedom and property rights away ... As the saying goes,
“Decide in haste; repent in leisure.”
To join the many disgruntled homeowners and landowners
living within the view of this proposed project working to STOP the known
negative impacts the development of this Industrial Wind Factory will create,
CONTACT: Save Ontario Skylines (S.O.S.) at: (716) 795-3571, or
www.GreatLakesWindTruth.org.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)