Few words stir up passion and polarization like sustainability. The EPA offers up this description. "The traditional definition of sustainability calls for policies and strategies that meet society’s present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." Gee, who could disagree with such touchy and feely sentiments? The answer is always in the details and when you strip away the platitudes, what remains is a coordinated plot to enslave humanity under a burden of a Carbon Tax scheme. The environment has more risk from globalist central planning than from any fossil fuel emissions. Proponents of the global warming religion demonstrate a disdain for rational thinking that challenges their doctrine of a heterodox belief. The sustainability cult ignores any evidence that conflicts with their political agenda.
The accomplished author Robert Bryce cites in Forbes, A New Study Takes The Wind Out Of Wind Energy.
"For years, it's been an article of faith among advocates of renewables that increased use of wind energy can provide a cost-effective method of reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The reality: wind energy's carbon dioxide-cutting benefits are vastly overstated.
But if wind energy doesn't significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, then critics can easily challenge the industry's hefty subsidies, which include the federal production tax credit of $0.022 for each kilowatt-hour of electricity. That amounts to a subsidy of $6.44 per million BTU of energy produced. For comparison, in 2008, the Energy Information Administration reported that subsidies to the oil and gas sector totaled $1.9 billion per year, or about $0.03 per million BTU of energy produced. In other words, subsidies to the wind sector are more than 200 times as great as those given to the oil and gas sector on the basis of per-unit-of-energy produced.
If those fat subsidies go away, then the U.S. wind sector will be stopped dead in its tracks. And for consumers, that should be welcome news."
(Click to read the entire article)
Blog Archive
-
?
2011
(305)
-
?
July
(20)
- NYS DOT document warns of hydrofracking road damage
- Town of Wales, New York, Adopts Community Rights O...
- Document estimates fracking's toll on N.Y. roads
- Gas company eyes Utica Shale in NY
- Sustainability in All Things except Rational Thinking
- Alfred looks to ban hydrofracking
- The Kessel NYPA Watch, June 26, 2011 – By George J...
- 'Fracking' Fees Buoy Some States
- FERC Proposal Would Subsidize Long-Distance Transm...
- Hydrofracking's impact on air quality concerns some
- Committee to Preserve the Finger Lakes is speaking...
- DEC chief: Fracking blueprint progressing
- Frack map
- Gas firm wants to extend Southern Tier leases
- DEC releases updated, longer report on fracking
- Auburn to ban wastewater from gas drillers
- DEC: Local hydrofracking bans could end up in court
- Energy group, environmentalists point to contradic...
- PRI seeks to inject science into gas-drilling debate
- Will the DEC report appease anyone?
-
?
July
(20)