It was a familiar sight early Wednesday afternoon outside the Senate chamber.
In front of the bright lights of television cameras and a handful of microphones and recorders, a coalition of groups and lawmakers opposed to hydraulic fracturing for natural gas stood next to six boxes packed with petitions supporting a statewide ban on the technique. The petitions had more than 200,000 signatures, according to the groups.
At the same time, members of a gas industry trade group were fanned across the Capitol and Legislative Office Building, selling the job-creation and energy-independence benefits associated with gas drilling to lawmakers and members of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's staff.
But in a battle that has stretched on for nearly four years at the Capitol, have the public protests and behind-the-scenes wrangling had any impact on the debate? Both sides said Wednesday that they have, but differed in how so.
"This process has slowed down to a crawl, though it's still moving ahead," said Sen. Tony Avella, D-Queens, who sponsors a bill to permanently ban hydrofracking. "I absolutely think we're winning this battle. I think (Cuomo's) getting the message."
(Click to read the entire article)
Blog Archive
-
?
2012
(128)
-
?
May
(11)
- DiNapoli to Chesapeake shareholders: Withhold dire...
- Congressional candidate Danks Burke speaks on hydr...
- Electric Power Generation under NYS Article X
- Electricity bills set to rise to pay for wind farm...
- NY groups cheer Vermont hydrofracking ban
- New York regulations would prevent Pennsylvania hy...
- Anti Frackers are laying down on the job
- ‘PC’ Power Is Not Sustainable (and President Obama...
- Obama proposes fracking companies disclose chemicals
- In fracking fight, protests may be having an impact
- Cuomo Recommends New Chairman For Power Authority
-
?
May
(11)