The growing U.S. market for carbon offsets -- vouchers that let companies and individuals project an environmentally friendly image by paying others to cut their greenhouse-gas emissions -- is so opaque and loosely regulated that it offers consumers "limited assurance of credibility," according to a federal audit.
The report, expected to be published on Friday, stops short of recommending new regulations. But it suggests members of Congress think carefully before letting companies use offsets as a means of complying with legislation to control carbon-dioxide emissions, which are not currently regulated by the U.S. government.
Estimates vary on the size of the U.S. offset market, with some analysts putting the value of U.S. carbon offsets traded in 2006 at $91.6 million, an amount expected to grow sharply as more companies and individuals seek to lighten their impact on the atmosphere, or at least appear to be trying. Some companies are also betting the offsets they buy now will count toward their obligations under a future mandatory U.S. emissions-reduction system.
As purchases of voluntary offsets have soared in recent years, so have questions about whether money being spent on them funds real emissions cuts. Such offsets, which are often bought by consumers from online sellers, are supposed to represent emissions avoided through projects such as installing wind turbines or planting trees. Skeptics -- including some members of Congress -- have questioned how consumers can know in the absence of federal regulation whether such cuts are actually being implemented, or would have happened anyway.
(Click to read entire article)
Blog Archive
-
?
2008
(616)
-
?
September
(40)
- First carbon permits auctioned in U.S.
- GAO Faults 'Credibility' Of CO2-Offset Market
- Clean-tech bubble talk
- NYISO has wind-power forecasting system installed
- Northeast CO2 on Auction Block
- Financial crisis: Lehman misses out on carbon cred...
- Exploring New York’s Energy Options: Solar Power
- More hearings to be held on NYRI proposal
- FERC conditionally grants incentives for New York ...
- Iberdrola completes Energy East buy
- PSC faults utilities for service failures
- Controversial path to possible glut of natural gas
- PSC reviews NYSEG's service performance
- NY regulators evaluate electricity reliability
- Iberdrola closes Energy East deal
- AG's office warns of gas-lease pressure tactics
- Schumer to meet with head of FERC to sort out ener...
- Credit crisis hurting clean energy sector: bankers
- Officials to address impact of gas rush
- N.Y. soul sold to wind power giant
- Proposed Legislation Would Prohibit Gas Drilling
- Drilling bids in Pa. good sign for Tier
- Cuomo: Approach gas contracts with caution
- Enron Investors' Lawyers Get Record $688 Million Fee
- NYRI Power Line decision by August 2009
- Iberdrola wants to see Energy East details
- Landowners cry foul over seismic searches
- The Finger Lakes Guardian monthly publication
- NYRI power line application deemed complete
- Schumer says area landowners should have free lega...
- NYRI hearing to be held in Oneonta
- If you had to choose one, which method of offshore...
- PSC approves $4.5B Iberdrola deal to take over Ene...
- Is the state getting shorted on gas lease royalties?
- Wind Power May Gain Footing Off Coast of U.S.
- A Big Future for Tiny Wind Turbines?
- Piezoelectric Hydropower System May Power 20-40% o...
- N. Y. natural gas production falls just shy of all...
- Deep-well Natural Gas Drilling a Concern for State...
- Economic advisor to lead new US Office for Environ...
-
?
September
(40)