April 15, 2008
TO: Town Council Members
Town Planning Board Members
Residents of Clayton
Residents of Orleans
Residents of Jefferson County
Jefferson County Legislators
Members of ECCO
Interested Parties for Residents Living Next Turbines
ECCO has been given the attached copies of the new noise study “Accuracy of Model Predications and Effects of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Turbine Noise at Maple Ridge Wind Power Facility, Lowville, New York – 2007 “. Also attached is a copy of Mr. Clifford Schneider’s letter to Mr. Steve Tomasik, Energy Projects and Management, NYS DEC.
ECCO asks that you take the time to read this document. The Clayton and Orleans Industrial Horse Creek Wind Power Project is the same energy company that owns the Maple Ridge Wind Farm, PPM Energy. The Clayton and Orleans turbine settings are precisely the same turbine settings as those in the Maple Ridge Wind Farm, 1250 feet from a resident’s home.
The chief complaint of residents living next to turbines is the noise impacts from the turbines both audible and inaudible sound. These machines are harmful to health and welfare if not set correctly. It is important that the turbines be set using the sound measurements from resident’s property lines to protect residents from these side effects. The NYS DEC has noise assessment guidelines for use by Townships to help protect residents. The Towns of Clayton and Orleans local law/ordinance for Wind Energy Facilities is not using these guidelines. To date the NYS DEC has not taken an active role as part of their review process of wind farm projects on the noise analysis impacts. NYS DEC must start becoming active in this part of the permitting process of wind energy projects. Our Town leaders continue to ignore their resident’s letters to change the local law then it is time for residents in all of Jefferson County to write to the NYS DEC telling them to become active in the review of the noise analysis from the turbines proposed in wind projects. We ask you to write to Mr. Tomasik asking the NYS DEC to be active in this role and that projects should use the recommended guidelines set by NYS DEC on Noise Assessment for placement of wind turbines.
To date Residents in the Townships of Clayton and Orleans are continuing to ask the Town Councils (they control the local law/ordinance) of these two Townships to amend their Local Law/Ordinance of 2007 for Wind Energy Facilities to use the NYS DEC Noise Assessment Guidelines using residents property lines. This past year ECCO has brought forward to these Townships factual documented information on harmful side effects as well as we have provided engineers and acoustic experienced engineers to speak to these Townships that the present local law/ordinance is harmful to residents in the Horse Creek Wind Farm Project if it is not changed. We residents must insist on a “responsible” local law/ordinance be in place before the turbines go up. There are over 2,500 residents affected by these 62 turbines in Horse Creek.
Please distribute these documents and ask your families, friends and neighbors to write on behalf of all residents in Jefferson County who will live within and one and half mile from all industrial wind energy projects here.
Thank you
ECCO
Blog Archive
-
?
2008
(616)
-
?
April
(112)
- Can The Optimum Carbon Tax Possibly Be Zero? by Ji...
- Schumer raps PSC for handling of RG&E takeover
- Millennium pipeline fuels economy
- Politicians call for widespread reform of governme...
- Cuomo On Member Item Fraud
- Fraud Is Everywhere
- Bush blames Congress for high gas prices by Klaus ...
- EST's Carbon Challenge: traditional versus energy-...
- Sustainable Energy Fair growing, organizers say
- The Biofuels Disaster Must End
- Zoning board to decide extending Reunion’s wind te...
- The Real Politics of Fuel Economy
- DEC to head turbine study
- Undoing America's Ethanol Mistake
- Forests And Farms Have Significant Role As Alterna...
- Iberdrola again threatens to call off merger By LA...
- Tonko files papers for Congressional run
- Solar Energy; Not Just Electricity
- Green Ink: Playing Hardball with OPEC
- Michigan can grow biofuels the right way
- CleanSkies.tv
- Bath utility proposal tabled
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Energy: Lesson...
- Transport energy now 'No. 1 issue' facing U.S.
- U.S. Earth Day goes political and corporate
- Earth Day Cartoon
- DEC Joins Six Public and Private Organizations on ...
- Commissioner Glynn Announces Environmental Initiat...
- Iberdrola's bid for Energy East on hold
- Mother Jones' Energy Issue: The Nuclear Option, Fo...
- PSC to take up and vote on Iberdrola acquition of ...
- New York has regulatory labyrinth
- NY Governor outlines initial steps to meet downsta...
- Republicans Ask for Investigation Into Carbon Offs...
- Landfill Gas Capture: Cutting Emissions and Saving...
- Bush Remarks on Climate
- Global Warming Tax Hikes Headed Your Way
- Public Service argues utility takeover proposal
- Looking Forward, an Energy Scramble or a Blueprint?
- Kansas coal dispute seen as important for national...
- Where our energy dollars go
- Editorial: Energy plan must consider whole state
- Iwo Jima Veterans Blast Time's 'Special Environmen...
- Massa ahead of Kuhl — in funds
- Winner proposing ‘easier EZ’ legislation
- FERC statement on market-based rates for wholesale...
- President's Remarks Recognize Political Reality of...
- Grants awarded to 52 land-trust organizations
- Bush: US to halt greenhouse gas rise by 2025
- Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in E...
- ChangeWave Survey Points to a Reduction in U.S. Co...
- Tax breaks for industry make way into housing bill
- NEW NOISE STUDY OF MAPLE RIDGE WIND FARM
- RG&E purchase may be in trouble, Iberdrola chief says
- Ethanol and bio-diesel: Fuels or threats to food s...
- Against human prosperity
- Time has come for renewable energy
- Help Us Find the Web's Best Stories on the Environ...
- Canadians Want More Protection Of Resources From U...
- How The Energy Revolution Affects You!
- Could Chemical Solar Power Beat Photovoltaics?
- Read our studies!
- White House weighing new U.S. CO2 proposal: sources
- Nonprofit to turn gas into energy
- Let's get off our duffs on energy policy - Congres...
- N.Y to develop energy board, plan
- The Audacity of Environmental Optimism
- H.R. 3221: New Direction for Energy Independence, ...
- PATERSON OUTLINES INITIAL STEPS TO MEET DOWNSTATE ...
- Gas Plant in L.I. Sound Is Rejected
- State politics could play havoc with energy plan
- Iberdrola could reconsider Energy East plan
- IDA Reform Effort Update
- PATERSON: I'LL SLASH BUDGET BY $12 BIL by DAVID SE...
- US Senate Votes For Solar, Wind Tax Credits; Faces...
- SEC Files Action On Fuelless Motor Fraud
- Weather hots up under wind farms
- Iberdrola to reconsider Energy East buy if NY cour...
- Budget built on borrowing, fees
- State seeks deep sites to hold greenhouse gas
- Strange Bedfellows: Manufacturers Lobby For Clean-...
- Paved with Green Intentions
- Texas firm now selling power in New York
- Citizen Power Alliance April 9, 2008 Letter to U.S...
- Legislators seek to repeal federal control of LNG ...
- Brazil Not the Best Model for U.S. Energy Independ...
- Corker says new energy policy would affect nation ...
- First Annual Summit Focuses On Alternative Energy ...
- World’s First Integrated Wind Turbines Inaugurated...
- U.S. energy policy is needed; coal will still play...
- More than just pond scum: Fueling the need for alt...
- Cooling Trend expected to continue throughout most...
- A 'dysfunctional, irrational' energy policy by Eri...
- Against the grain: What are they thinking? Part 2
- Tifton scientist working on new energy process
- Fallout from the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Pt. 2
- Ethanol: great politics, ineffective energy
- Fortune 500 company eyes Big Flats
- Senators offer bill to extend alternative fuel inc...
- Corruption in the awarding of wind farm concession...
-
?
April
(112)